Google Wants You to Out Good Sites. Really!

August 29, 2013
By Rhea Drysdale in SEO

Yesterday, Google’s Head of Web Spam, Matt Cutts, shared a link to a simple Docs survey where they’re asking webmasters to report high-quality small sites that you think should rank better. Yes, you heard that right. They want to know about GOOD sites!

If you’re like the Outspoken Media team, this was met with a company-wide, “wha?!”

While Google has been working hard over recent years to make it easier for the Web Spam team to connect with and inform webmasters, they’re usually looking for help outing bad sites. Whether it’s more support for reconsideration requests, new language on link schemes, or the recently released (then revoked, then re-released) Manual Actions report in Webmaster Tools.

Big Brands vs Small Business For years we’ve debated the issue of size and brand as it relates to rankings and it’s interesting to see that Google is now soliciting advice from the masses to test the quality of the algorithm. The debate has raged since 2008 (and before). I put the “big business vs little guy” graphic together (thanks Todd for sharing it so long ago) to help sort through some hypocritical assumptions on Google’s part when it comes to website behavior. We’re used to the perception that big brands get away with murder while small businesses suffer, but I’ve always believed that when it comes to the algorithm it really is a matter of brand signals versus the actual size of the brand. The more sites behave like actual businesses and invest in brand development, the more they’ll align with the direction Google is going with quality signals for greater search rankings.

However, as Barry Schwartz cited,

“only 30% of SEOs believe web site size does not matter in terms of rankings.”

At first we didn’t believe the survey was legit, because it’s so simple. How could Google possibly review all of the submissions they’ll undoubtedly receive? But truthfully, how many webmasters feel confident enough in their site’s backlink profile to submit?

Will you?

I know there are plenty of webmasters who believe in the legitimacy of their link building practices, but we typically find a history riddled with old, highly questionable links. At Outspoken, we work hard to rehab those efforts, but the threshold of what’s acceptable is changing daily with the most recent updates affecting press releases, guest posts, advertorials, and Twitter reacts to Google’s request for good sites:

UPDATE:

Sorting through yesterday’s tweets, it looks like Google had only received a couple hundred websites at that point:

SEO
SEO

How to Choose an SEO Company: Ignore Top SEO Lists

on Feb 22 by Rhea Drysdale

Finding a SEO company can be hard work! The process of hiring a SEO vendor or consultant in a sea…

Internet Marketing Conferences
Internet Marketing Conferences

PubCon 2012 Las Vegas Coverage, Day 3 Morning

on Oct 18 by Pearl Higgins

It’s the home stretch folks, and in case you missed it, we had some great coverage up last night. Those…

Internet Marketing Conferences
Internet Marketing Conferences SEO

Duplicate Content Solutions & The Canonical Tag

on Jun 2 by Lisa Barone

Now that we’ve gotten the bugs out, it’s time to get technical! Watch as my head spins. Actually, Stephan Spencer…

^Back to Top