Setting client expectations for online reputation management can be tough. No two clients are exactly alike even if their situations appear to be very similar. Some clients can see their problem disappear in two weeks and others can be as frustratingly difficult to outrank as [pay day loans] or [mesothelioma]. This means I’m constantly on the lookout for new ways to improve the results for our ORM clients and Google gave me some hope on August 20th when they announced that they were now showing more search results from a single domain.

As Barry Schwartz and Andy Beal were quick to point out, this should be an obvious win for the ORM industry. Everyone in the community let out a “woohoo!” and we watched as SEOs competing for branded terms demanded change when their rankings dropped from #3 to #9.

Like everyone else I loved the idea of indexing multiple pages from a single domain. It would solve the problem of us recommending clients split their attention and back links between the main site and optimized sub domains or micro-sites. I could keep both my SEO and ORM hats on without giving counterintuitive advice. The only problem would be figuring out how to get more results for one domain.

When Malcolm Coles first discovered the update there was some conversation surrounding how these results were being generated. Buessery and Bill Slawski both saw the results as a new query display for entity pages. On Search Engine Land Stephan Spencer asserted that Google was displaying the “host crowded” listings broken out at the top of the SERPs rather than indented and hidden as “more results from [domain.com] >>.” One thing is absolutely certain, only a few branded searches and domains have been “gifted” with more search results.

It wasn’t until I was prepping for my Web 2.0 Expo SEO/SMO 101 presentation in New York on Sunday that I even saw a more search results query in real life for [web 2.0 expo] and it was a biggie:

I started checking the other conferences and it looked like many had similar results including [search engine strategies], [search marketing expo], [pubcon] and [sxsw]. Branching outside of conferences I found the same more results appearing for related associations like [sempo] and non-industry associations like [american cancer society]. Google suggested in their post on the update that exhibitions at museums were a perfect example of a site meriting more search results. Sure enough the [metropolitan museum of art] and even the [national zoo] have more results. I checked universities next, but couldn’t find one with more results even though these seem like they would be a perfect fit as well. Most of the universities had a significant amount of sub domains and other domains broken out in the top 10 results though, which leads me to the question of when do these results appear?

More Results Correspond with Average Monthly Search Volume

The more results appear to have a direct correlation with the average monthly search volume of each given query. The more a user searches for a single query, but navigates to different pages (e.g. exhibits or new conference dates) the more likely those pages are to appear. One important consideration is that the more results do not always mimic the site links for a domain. If to Bill’s point these pages are host crowded results for entity domains, which have historically been limited to showing no more than two results per domain, then in order to make your site appear with more results you would need to have the same characteristics of these entity domains.

Traffic and back links still matter. When I looked at the global monthly search volumes for the corresponding query, the pages that got the most traffic were almost always the pages that appeared in the more results (exceptions discussed below). Why do those pages get more traffic? They meet user intent, they’re trusted and they have a lot of back links or in some situations were on the receiving end of a 301 redirect from an old page with a ton of links.

We still have to do the work! Just like building links to a sub domain, it will still take time to send enough links and generate enough traffic on these individual pages for a particular query to produce more results. Even then, does this domain qualify as an “entity”?

Some interesting observations with regards to the more search results:

More Results Can Be Personalized

When I searched for [bbb], I got the main bbb.org domain as well as several for upstateny.bbb.org specific to my location:

More Results Vary for Brand + Modifier

Do a search for [search engine strategies san jose] or [apple ipod] and you’ll get a different set of results from the main brand:

More Results Don’t Always Meet User Intent

When I did a search for [search engine land] Google returned a big list of blog posts rather than the main categories. Does this really meet user intent?

More Results, Query Deserves Freshness and Social Indicators

Continuing with the [search engine land] results, QDF indicators have to be getting factored into the More Results while social indicators don’t appear to play a huge role. Honestly, I don’t know why some of these posts are appearing for different blog brands and would love to hear your theories, so post ‘em up in the comments!

Meanwhile, let’s get back to work because this isn’t a fast win for ORM unless you’re already wielding a big entity-marked brand.


About the Author

Rhea Drysdale

Rhea Drysdale is the Chief Executive Officer of Outspoken Media. When she isn't fighting for the SEO industry, she's She-Ra on Twitter. Connect with Rhea on Google.


12 thoughts on “How is Google Indexing More Search Results?


  • Ross Hudgens on said:

    Nice post, Rhea. Although I don’t have much to contribute analytically to this, it did make me ponder the following: If I link to a Google search query enough times with the query anchor text, will it rank? More importantly, will the world explode?


  • Kevin on said:

    Google searches aren’t indexable:)

    Toolbar search URLs start with /search, and that directory is blocked by robots.txt. Searching from Google.com inserts a # at the beginning of the query string.


  • Jonathan Beaton on said:

    Pretty busy today but the Twitter post intrigued me because I hadn’t found a quality answer to this question yet. I am sure there are other small variables in play (as always) but I think it is safe to say search volume is the most meaningful correlation.

    Thanks Rhea!


    • Rhea Drysdale on said:

      Jonathan – thanks for taking the time to comment! I’m usually pretty busy, too, so these posts are rare , but I love reading positive feedback that reaffirms that maybe I *should* leave my client work cave more often. Thanks for the positive response! :)


  • Rob Woods on said:

    I’m actually seeing this same behavior on results for my brand without any lift in queries for the brand or any signals that would indicate that QDF should kick in. 7 of the top 10 listings for the brand name are from our domain compared to only 2 a few days ago.


    • Rhea Drysdale on said:

      Whoa, nice SERP. I’ve only seen potential QDF factors for blog-specific searches, haven’t noticed that for any domains that were bigger brands, ecommerce or institutions, so doubt it’d appear here for you. Just did a search for [build direct blog] and getting more posts all from recent months.

      Interesting that so many of your results are flooring focused vs main nav on the site. Some duplication with the site links… are those the most trafficked pages?


      • Rob Woods on said:

        Yeah. When you look at the query “builddirect” the results that are showing up are the pages that have the highest traffic/most link equity on the www. subdomain only. Even though the blog. subdomain has lots of link equity it doesn’t show up.


  • Pradeep on said:

    I am a bit contrast at this point: ‘More Results Don’t Always Meet User Intent’. Though I am not sure about every search, I often reach Apple’s products(Downloads, iTunes,Store etc..) and New York Times latest news updates just from the links it displays beneath the link details(which we call as more results section) which means Google displays the main categories of these sites which are most likely visited by their users. And to the search ‘search engine land’ I see main sections of the website like this:
    SEO Become a member
    Latest how to articles About Us
    News SEM
    Columns

    Also I noticed that the results to the above search changes when we click on the ‘More results from searchengineland.com’. Which exactly have the results you had had in this post. So just as you said, I believe there can be multiple reasons behind but two points remains same: ‘Relevance and Popularity’.


    • Rhea Drysdale on said:

      Pradeep, I agree that the site links for SEL do meet user intent, but those results below the first result feel off. Will be interesting to see how this shifts as Google collects more data.


  • Roshan on said:

    having so many pages from the same website dilutes user appeal and choices. Almost like using the site: operator. Google should come up with all extra pages within sitelinks (perhaps with description / date or other useful information regarding the page) but the search should present results and not results from a site.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments links could be nofollow free.