<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 6 Search Operators I’d Be Lost Without</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:32:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel Howe</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-23454</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel Howe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 05:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-23454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like your post Lisa! Very useful to those new in the SEO field, and educational for who aren&#039;t. Definitely learned a few things!

-Rachel]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your post Lisa! Very useful to those new in the SEO field, and educational for who aren&#8217;t. Definitely learned a few things!</p>
<p>-Rachel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhea Drysdale</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-20363</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhea Drysdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-20363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed and that sounds like a delicious search! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed and that sounds like a delicious search! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhea Drysdale</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-20362</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhea Drysdale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-20362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Brian, that was my comment, so sorry to hop into this late. Here&#039;s what I&#039;m saying...

Let&#039;s grab a random site like the Children&#039;s Brain Tumor Foundation. I know their website&#039;s canonical version is http://www.cbtf.org/ but I wanted to know if they were splitting their page rank and opening themselves up to duplicate content by not effectively redirecting the non-www version of their site to the www version. It should be simple enough to check that manually, but I know that by doing this query in Google I might find some interesting issues in addition to that.

So, I did a quick Google search with the query: [site:cbtf.org -inurl:www] which removed all indexed versions of the site with www. The results were surprising:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=site%3Acbtf.org+-inurl%3Awww&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=

This seems like a simple check just to see if a site has a 301 redirect setup properly for non-www to www. But when we do this search we capture even more abnormalities like what you see in the search results above. They have a ww. indexed! There isn&#039;t a duplicate version of their site there, which is what we&#039;d typically see with maybe a https or www1 or www2. There is however a duped version of their developer&#039;s site, which should probably get addressed.

We&#039;ve worked on sites where we go through this process and discover literally hundreds of duped versions of a site! 

Hope that helps, if not, feel free to hit me up: rhea@outspokenmedia.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian, that was my comment, so sorry to hop into this late. Here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m saying&#8230;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s grab a random site like the Children&#8217;s Brain Tumor Foundation. I know their website&#8217;s canonical version is <a href="http://www.cbtf.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbtf.org/</a> but I wanted to know if they were splitting their page rank and opening themselves up to duplicate content by not effectively redirecting the non-www version of their site to the www version. It should be simple enough to check that manually, but I know that by doing this query in Google I might find some interesting issues in addition to that.</p>
<p>So, I did a quick Google search with the query: [site:cbtf.org -inurl:www] which removed all indexed versions of the site with www. The results were surprising:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;q=site%3Acbtf.org+-inurl%3Awww&#038;aq=f&#038;aqi=&#038;aql=&#038;oq=" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;safe=off&#038;q=site%3Acbtf.org+-inurl%3Awww&#038;aq=f&#038;aqi=&#038;aql=&#038;oq=</a></p>
<p>This seems like a simple check just to see if a site has a 301 redirect setup properly for non-www to www. But when we do this search we capture even more abnormalities like what you see in the search results above. They have a ww. indexed! There isn&#8217;t a duplicate version of their site there, which is what we&#8217;d typically see with maybe a https or www1 or www2. There is however a duped version of their developer&#8217;s site, which should probably get addressed.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve worked on sites where we go through this process and discover literally hundreds of duped versions of a site! </p>
<p>Hope that helps, if not, feel free to hit me up: <a href="mailto:rhea@outspokenmedia.com">rhea@outspokenmedia.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Piwarun</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-20131</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Piwarun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 20:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-20131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;related:&quot; is new to me as well - thanks for the heads up! &quot;Site:&quot; still rules the day though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;related:&#8221; is new to me as well &#8211; thanks for the heads up! &#8220;Site:&#8221; still rules the day though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-20114</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-20114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good tutorial. I find it great to improve my search results.

When I&#039;m looking for academic content it&#039;s very useful to use these operators. But from time to time Google is going to add some more and deletes some old. Thats why you have to stay tuned for the latest ones.
Another article just introduced some more operators providing useful videos:
http://geekroom.de/how-to/google-optimal-nutzen-features-fur-bessere-ergebnisse/

But compared to blekko Google cannot sort the results - damn. I hope this will come to Google, too soon...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good tutorial. I find it great to improve my search results.</p>
<p>When I&#8217;m looking for academic content it&#8217;s very useful to use these operators. But from time to time Google is going to add some more and deletes some old. Thats why you have to stay tuned for the latest ones.<br />
Another article just introduced some more operators providing useful videos:<br />
<a href="http://geekroom.de/how-to/google-optimal-nutzen-features-fur-bessere-ergebnisse/" rel="nofollow">http://geekroom.de/how-to/google-optimal-nutzen-features-fur-bessere-ergebnisse/</a></p>
<p>But compared to blekko Google cannot sort the results &#8211; damn. I hope this will come to Google, too soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Val @ Web Tracking Guide</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-20109</link>
		<dc:creator>Val @ Web Tracking Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-20109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t know about &quot;Related:&quot; - thank you, it&#039;s pure gold!

One more operator I find useful occasionally is the + sign immediately before a keyword. It makes Google to look for your exact word, without spelling corrections, synonyms, etc. Helps when Google is annoyingly trying to be smarter than you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know about &#8220;Related:&#8221; &#8211; thank you, it&#8217;s pure gold!</p>
<p>One more operator I find useful occasionally is the + sign immediately before a keyword. It makes Google to look for your exact word, without spelling corrections, synonyms, etc. Helps when Google is annoyingly trying to be smarter than you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-20039</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-20039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m actually ashamed I didn&#039;t know the filetype operator. For shame. *shakes head. Anyway, thanks so much for this short list of operators. I use site and define: myself.
Thanks!
 o_O]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually ashamed I didn&#8217;t know the filetype operator. For shame. *shakes head. Anyway, thanks so much for this short list of operators. I use site and define: myself.<br />
Thanks!<br />
 o_O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn@ t1 service</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-20000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn@ t1 service</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-20000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t know about the related operator either. I am about to try it out right now!! Good info!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know about the related operator either. I am about to try it out right now!! Good info!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Foster</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-19976</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-19976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post, my personal favourite is &#039;define:&#039; e.g. [define:SEO] It finds web definitions, useful when you see a term or acronym you don&#039;t know! I need to use site: more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, my personal favourite is &#8216;define:&#8217; e.g. [define:SEO] It finds web definitions, useful when you see a term or acronym you don&#8217;t know! I need to use site: more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelly kramer</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/seo/handy-search-operators/#comment-19966</link>
		<dc:creator>shelly kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=9645#comment-19966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i love your brain, woman. #thatisall]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love your brain, woman. #thatisall</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.290 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-15 16:02:37 -->
