Comments on: Duplicate Content Solutions & The Canonical Tag

By: Johan - Design Lover

Johan - Design Lover — Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:43:42 +0000

Thanks for this post. I’m totally into design, and follow eductation for it here in Arnhem (Holland). Keep up the good work! I’ll keep following posts on this blog.

Greetings from Holland

By: Kim

Kim — Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:59:36 +0000

This is a great post! I appreciate that you have put all the case studies in such detail. Thank you for doing this.

By: Alok

Alok — Fri, 27 Aug 2010 06:26:12 +0000

Hi Lisa,
your this post clear my confusion about page rank flow. Thanks

@Adam,
Past the below format with in your header tag.

By: Rob @ Web Design Talk

Rob @ Web Design Talk — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:25:09 +0000

Hi,

What would you recommend doing for paged product data on an eCommerce site? E.g. domain.com/category/dvds.php?page=1, domain.com/category/dvds.php?page=1#2 etc.

Thanks

By: Adam

Adam — Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:53:29 +0000

What is the code for canonical tags?

By: Introspective

Introspective — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:49:04 +0000

Should I stop publish my articles on article directories? I used to publish my articles, but now I wander should I stop doing this, because the risk of duplicate content penalty.

By: Mani

Mani — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:52:45 +0000

I’ve always avoided using NOFOLLOW, and now it seems as though it’s no longer beneficial to site owners to use it. I guess the search engines do need to keep a few things to themselves though, otherwise SEO would turn into a science and you’d have over-optimised sites everywhere… Would that be better? ;)

By: Bill Sebald

Bill Sebald — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:55:10 +0000

Sculpting always seemed to be boosting my efforts in at least “light” ways (though I never had the massive lifts that SEOs talked about in the early nofollow days), so I’m taking the side that the SMX words are being misinterpreted until something clear comes out. If something changed, and the PR transfer became even lower than before, then I believe it would have JUST changed within the month.

It’s still at the least valuable in keeping the index free of noise (and wasting spider efficiency on junk pages).

By: Damien Anderson

Damien Anderson — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:58:48 +0000

HAHA! I so loved the ‘on another note’ comment at the end of the feature! Melted mine as well!

Damien

By: Vern | AimforAwesome

Vern | AimforAwesome — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:37:37 +0000

I’ve never seen this mentioned… what about with multiple state focused sites… we have startillinoisbusiness.com, startgeorgiabusiness.com etc. They are all completely different focus, yet – we duplicate some of the info because it’s all about incorporation – which – at a national level doesn’t change much at all. I’ve been noindexing the pages that are duplicate but heck, that’s like 20 pages per site. Should I or no? I’d think no – Georgia is different from Illinois. The user experience is a good one if the info is same because it’s all great info – despite being the same. Quite a tricky question and I don’t know how to do this the right way… anyone?