<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Status Report Metrics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://outspokenmedia.com/internet-marketing-conferences/seo-status-report-metrics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/internet-marketing-conferences/seo-status-report-metrics/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:19:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtatrader.com</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/internet-marketing-conferences/seo-status-report-metrics/#comment-16949</link>
		<dc:creator>gtatrader.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=652#comment-16949</guid>
		<description>this article is loaded with tips. i&#039;ve bookmarked it. thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this article is loaded with tips. i&#8217;ve bookmarked it. thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://outspokenmedia.com/internet-marketing-conferences/seo-status-report-metrics/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://outspokenmedia.com/?p=652#comment-61</guid>
		<description>thats cool, but there can be a point when you just have to say enough research... i think spending more time around keywords initially is better, and im glad to hear someone finally say dont use wordtracker, its overpriced and outdated...

you can monitor you estimated CTR with a excel spreadsheet, can you can add in current rankings to confirm the variance on this data, if it is over that 85% mark towards being accurate you know that you have the right data set...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats cool, but there can be a point when you just have to say enough research&#8230; i think spending more time around keywords initially is better, and im glad to hear someone finally say dont use wordtracker, its overpriced and outdated&#8230;</p>
<p>you can monitor you estimated CTR with a excel spreadsheet, can you can add in current rankings to confirm the variance on this data, if it is over that 85% mark towards being accurate you know that you have the right data set&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

